Image Comparer development at a total standstill ?
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 9:07 pm
Hi.
Just curious if all development has stopped regarding Image Comparer. It's been about 16 months - more or less - since any update from version 2.3.
Naturally, any improvements as far as speed of the program and improved image management and disrimination, as well as a more flexible GUI would also be welcomed.
However It'd be nice to have a built-in Help File / CHM, if nothing else.
At any rate, it's rather disappointing to have read this post from quite a while back:
We'd all be grateful for any improvements and to have the option of having the improvements made available to those of us who've paid good money for a program which now seems to have been all but ignored as far as any further development.
Thanks for your attention.
Just curious if all development has stopped regarding Image Comparer. It's been about 16 months - more or less - since any update from version 2.3.
Naturally, any improvements as far as speed of the program and improved image management and disrimination, as well as a more flexible GUI would also be welcomed.
However It'd be nice to have a built-in Help File / CHM, if nothing else.
At any rate, it's rather disappointing to have read this post from quite a while back:
bolide wrote:Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 8:22 am Post subject: Re: v2.3 - "Exclude files" misleading dialog message
bolide
Site Admin
bolide wrote:Somebody asks to do it this way.motobojo wrote:Why did you replace "Delete records" with "Exclude files"?
I don't like many things in Image Comparer too, but I'm not an author and I have a bad agreement with the author at this moment. Even don't know if there will be any new version, sorry.
I think the best way to improve Image Comparer is completely rewrite it and change some concepts even. But I can't do it now
We'd all be grateful for any improvements and to have the option of having the improvements made available to those of us who've paid good money for a program which now seems to have been all but ignored as far as any further development.
Thanks for your attention.